Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Walker M, Wade MG, Liu S, Krewski D. Environmental hazards: evidence for effects on child health. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2007;10(1–2):3–39.
Google Scholar
Eaton W. The logic for a conception-to-death cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:445–51.
Google Scholar
Frank J, Di Ruggiero E, McInnes RR, Kramer M, Gagnon F. Large life-course cohorts for characterizing genetic and environmental contributions: the need for more thoughtful designs. Epidemiology. 2006;17:595–8.
Google Scholar
Canova C, Cantarutti A. Population-Based Birth Cohort Studies in Epidemiology. IJERPH. 2020;17:5276.
Google Scholar
Lam J, Lanphear BP, Bellinger D, Axelrad DA, McPartland J, Sutton P, et al. Developmental PBDE exposure and IQ/ADHD in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(8):086001.
Google Scholar
Rauh VA, Margolis AE. Research Review: Environmental exposures, neurodevelopment, and child mental health – new paradigms for the study of brain and behavioral effects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(7):775–93.
Google Scholar
Lanphear BP. The Impact of Toxins on the Developing Brain. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:211–30.
Google Scholar
Office of the Surgeon General (US); Office on Smoking and Health (US). The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2004.
Domagala-Kulawik J. Effects of cigarette smoke on the lung and systemic immunity. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59(Suppl 6):19–34.
Google Scholar
Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Turner MC, Bérubé A, Yang Q, Liu S, Krewski D. Epidemiologic evidence of relationships between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2008;11(5–6):373–517.
Google Scholar
Grigg J. Environmental toxins; their impact on children’s health. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(3):244–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2002.022202.
Google Scholar
Jarup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull. 2003;68:167–82.
Google Scholar
Jarup L, Berglund M, Elinder CG, Nordberg G, Vahter M. Health effects of cadmium exposure – a review of the literature and a risk estimate. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24(Suppl 1):1–51.
Google Scholar
Murata K, Grandjean P, Dakeishi M. Neurophysiological evidence of methylmercury neurotoxicity. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:765–71.
Google Scholar
Bearer CF. The special and unique vulnerability of children to environmental hazards. Neurotoxicology. 2000;21(6):925–34.
Google Scholar
Koopman-Esseboom C, Weisglas-Kuperus N, de Ridder MA, Van der Paauw CG, Tuinstra LG, Sauer PJ. Effects of polychlorinated biphenyl/dioxin exposure and feeding type on infants’ mental and psychomotor development. Pediatrics. 1996;97(5):700–6.
Google Scholar
Rogan WJ, Chen A. Health risks and benefits of bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (DDT). Lancet. 2005;366:763–73.
Google Scholar
Weselak M, Arbuckle TE, Foster W. Pesticide exposures and developmental outcomes: the epidemiological evidence. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2007;10:41–80.
Google Scholar
Boersma ER, Lanting CI. Environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins – consequences for longterm neurological and cognitive development of the child lactation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000;478:271–87.
Google Scholar
Reuben A, Caspi A, Belsky DW, et al. Association of Childhood Blood Lead Levels With Cognitive Function and Socioeconomic Status at Age 38 Years and With IQ Change and Socioeconomic Mobility Between Childhood and Adulthood. JAMA. 2017;317(12):1244–51.
Google Scholar
Hu CY, Qiao JC, Gui SY, Xu KX, Dzhambov AM, Zhang XJ. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2023;231(Pt 2):116064.
Google Scholar
Gochfeld M, Burger J. Disproportionate exposures in environmental justice and other populations: the importance of outliers. Am J Public Health. 2011;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S53–63.
Google Scholar
Hoover E, et al. Indigenous peoples of North America: environmental exposures. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(12):1645–9.
Google Scholar
Schildroth S, Geller RJ, Wesselink AK, Lovett SM, Bethea TN, Claus Henn B, Harmon QE, Taylor KW, Calafat AM, Wegienka G, Gaston SA, Baird DD, Wise LA. Hair product use and urinary biomarker concentrations of non-persistent endocrine disrupting chemicals among reproductive-aged Black women. Chemosphere. 2024;361:142442.
Google Scholar
Elamurugan K, Esmaeilisaraji L, Strain J, Ziraldo H, Root A, MacDonald H, et al. Social Inequities Contributing to Gestational Diabetes in Indigenous Populations in Canada: A Scoping Review. Can J Diabetes. 2022;46:628–639.e1.
Google Scholar
Luo ZC, Liu JM, Fraser WD. Large prospective birth cohort studies on environmental contaminants and child health – Goals, challenges, limitations and needs. Med Hypotheses. 2010;74(2):318–24.
Google Scholar
Price A, Bryson H, Smith A, Mensah F, Goldfeld S. Processes for engaging and retaining women who are experiencing adversity in longitudinal health services research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):833.
Google Scholar
Mapes BM, Foster CS, Kusnoor SV, Epelbaum MI, AuYoung M, Jenkins G, et al. Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0234962.
Google Scholar
Leung BM, McDonald SW, Kaplan BJ, Giesbrecht GF, Tough SC. Comparison of sample characteristics in two pregnancy cohorts: Community-based versus population-based recruitment methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):149.
Google Scholar
Muggli E, Curd H, Nagle C, Forster D, Halliday J. Engaging pregnant women in observational research: A qualitative exploratory study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):334.
Google Scholar
Goldstein E, Bakhireva LN, Nervik K, Hagen S, Turnquist A, Zgierska AE, et al. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2021;85:106974.
Google Scholar
Porta M, Gasull M, Puigdomènech E, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Pumarega J, Rebato C, Borrell C. Sociodemographic factors influencing participation in the Barcelona Health Survey study on serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants. Chemosphere. 2009;76(2):216–25.
Google Scholar
Arbuckle TE, Fraser WD, Fisher M, Davis K, Liang CL, Lupien N, et al. Cohort profile: the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals research platform. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(4):415–25.
Google Scholar
Letourneau N, Aghajafari F, Bell RC, Deane AJ, Dewey D, Field C, et al. APrON Study Team. The Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) longitudinal study: cohort profile and key findings from the first three years. BMJ Open 2022;12(2):e047503.
Subbarao P, Anand SS, Becker AB, Befus AD, Brauer M, Brook JR, et al. CHILD Study investigators. The Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Study: examining developmental origins of allergy and asthma. Thorax 2015t;70(10):998–1000.
Adhikari K, Patten SB, Williamson T, Patel AB, Premji S, Tough S, et al. Does neighborhood socioeconomic status predict the risk of preterm birth? A community-based Canadian cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e025341.
Google Scholar
Bartholomew K, Morton S, Atatoa Carr PE, Bandara DK, Grant CC. Provider engagement and choice in the Lead Maternity Carer System: Evidence from Growing Up in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:323–30.
Google Scholar
Loxton D, Powers J, Anderson AE, Townsend N, Harris ML, Tuckerman R, Pease S, Mishra G, Byles J. Online and Offline Recruitment of Young Women for a Longitudinal Health Survey: Findings From the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health 1989–95 Cohort. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e109.
Google Scholar
Michikawa T, Nitta H, Nakayama SF, Yamazaki S, Isobe T, Tamura K, Suda E, Ono M, Yonemoto J, Iwai-Shimada M, Kobayashi Y, Suzuki G, Kawamoto T; Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group. Baseline Profile of Participants in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J Epidemiol 2018;28(2):99–104.
Mcleroy K, Bibeau DL, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecology perspective on health promotion programs article in health education quarterly. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77.
Google Scholar
Beasley LO, Ciciolla L, Jespersen JE, et al. Best Practices for Engaging Pregnant and Postpartum Women at Risk of Substance Use in Longitudinal Research Studies: a Qualitative Examination of Participant Preferences. Adv Res Sci. 2020;1:235–46.
Google Scholar
Goedhart NS, Pittens CACM, Tončinic S, Zuiderent-Jerak T, Dedding C, Broerse JEW. Engaging citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in research: a narrative review using a systematic search. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7:59.
Google Scholar
Daley E, Alio A, Anstey EH, Chandler R, Dyer K, Helmy H. Examining barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in Florida through a socio-ecological lens. J Community Health. 2011;36(1):121–31.
Google Scholar
Salihu H. Socio-ecological model as a framework for overcoming barriers and challenges in randomized control trials in minority and underserved communities. Int J MCH AIDS. 2014;3(1):85–95.
Google Scholar
van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Hooft L, van Delden JJM. Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women’s participation in research: A systematic review. Women Birth. 2018;31(5):350–61.
Google Scholar
Frew PM, Saint-Victor DS, Isaacs MB, Kim S, Swamy GK, Sheffield JS, Edwards KM, Villafana T, Kamagate O, Ault K. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(Suppl 7):S400–7.
Google Scholar
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J of Soc Res Method. 2005;8(1):19–32.
Google Scholar
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
Google Scholar
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.
Google Scholar
Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at Accessed 8 Mar 2024
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter D. Rindskopf & Sher KJ(Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Am Psychol. 2012;(2):57–71.
Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, Evans C, de Moraes ÉB, Godfrey CM, Pieper D, Saran A, Stern C, Munn Z. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3):520–32.
Google Scholar
Pollock D, Alexander L, Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Synnot A, Tricco AC. Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20(4):969–79.
Google Scholar
University of Ottawa, Department of Geography, Environment, and Geomatics. Prenatal Environmental Health Education Collaboration. Accessed 8 Mar 2024.
Ashman AM, Collins CE, Weatherall L, Brown LJ, Rollo ME, Clausen D, et al. A cohort of Indigenous Australian women and their children through pregnancy and beyond: the Gomeroi gaaynggal study. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2016;7(4):357–68.
Google Scholar
Bartholomew K, Morton S, Atatoa Carr PE, Bandara DK, Grant CC. Early engagement with a Lead Maternity Carer: Results from Growing Up in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:227–32.
Google Scholar
Bastain TM, Chavez T, Habre R, Girguis MS, Grubbs B, Toledo-Corral C. Study Design, Protocol and Profile of the Maternal And Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors (MADRES) Pregnancy Cohort: a Prospective Cohort Study in Predominantly Low-Income Hispanic Women in Urban Los Angeles. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:189.
Google Scholar
Begum F, Colman I, McCargar LJ, Bell RC, et al. Gestational Weight Gain and Early Postpartum Weight Retention in a Prospective Cohort of Alberta Women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(7):637–47.
Google Scholar
Chasan-Taber L, Fortner RT, Hastings V, Markenson G. Strategies for recruiting Hispanic women into a prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:57.
Google Scholar
Ernst SA, Günther K, Frambach T, Zeeb H. Prenatal recruitment of participants for a birth cohort study including cord blood collection: results of a feasibility study in Bremen. Germany GMS German Med Sci. 2015;13:1612–3174.
Faro E, Sauder K, Anders AL, Dunlop AL, Kerver JM, McGrath M, et al. Characteristics of Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohorts. Wolters Kiuwer Health. 2021;46:230.
García-Blanco A, Diago V, Hervas D, Ghosn F, Vento M, Cháfer-Pericás C. Anxiety and depressive symptoms, and stress biomarkers in pregnant women after in vitro fertilization: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(7):1237–46.
Google Scholar
Gracie SK, Lyon AW, Kehler HL, Pennell CE, Dolan SM, McNeil DA, et al. All Our Babies Cohort Study: recruitment of a cohort to predict women at risk of preterm birth through the examination of gene expression profiles and the environment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:87.
Google Scholar
Hertz-Picciotto I, Cassady D, Lee K, Bennett DH, Ritz B, Vogt R. Study of Use of Products and Exposure-Related Behaviors (SUPERB): study design, methods, and demographic characteristics of cohorts. Environ Health. 2010;9:54.
Google Scholar
Hertz-Picciotto I, Schmidt RJ, Walker CK, Bennett DH, Oliver M, Shedd-Wise KM, et al. A Prospective Study of Environmental Exposures and Early Biomarkers in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Design, Protocols, and Preliminary Data from the MARBLES Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;16:11.
Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K. et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:25.
Lara-Cinisomo S, Plott J, Grewen K, Meltzer-Brody S. The feasibility of recruiting and retaining perinatal Latinas in a biomedical study exploring neuroendocrine function and postpartum depression. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(5):1115–23.
Google Scholar
Loubet P, Guerrisi C, Turbelin,C. et al. First nationwide web-based surveillance system for influenza-like illness in pregnant women: participation and representativeness of the French G-GrippeNet cohort. BMC Public Health 2016;16:253.
Manca DP, O’Beirne M, Lightbody T, Johnston DW, Dymianiw DL, Nastalska K, Kaplan BJ. The most effective strategy for recruiting a pregnancy cohort: a tale of two cities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:75.
Google Scholar
Morton SM, Grant CC, Carr PE, Robinson EM, Kinloch JM, Fleming CJ, et al. How do you recruit and retain a Prebirth cohort? Lessons learnt from growing up in New Zealand. Eval Health Prof. 2014;37(4):411–33.
Google Scholar
Postma J, Younglove LR, Brooks K. Hispanic Representation in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2016;9(2):4.
Quante M, Hesse M, Döhnert M, et al. The LIFE child study: a life course approach to disease and health. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1021.
Google Scholar
Richiardi L, Baussano I, Vizzini L, Douwes J, Pearce N, Merletti F; NINFEA cohort. Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort. Eur J Epidemiol 2007;22(12):831–7.
Smith R, Alvarez C, Crixell S, Lane MA. The Food, Feelings, and Family Study: comparison of the efficacy of traditional methods, social media, and broadcast email to recruit pregnant women to an observational, longitudinal nutrition study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:203.
Google Scholar
Spallek J, Scholaske L, Kurt M, Lindner-Matthes D, Entringer S. Intergenerational transmission of health disparities among Turkish-origin immigrants in Germany: study protocol of a multi-centric cohort study (BaBi-stress and BaBeK study). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:158.
Google Scholar
von Ruesten A, Brantsaeter AL, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Mehlig K, Winkvist A, Lissner L. Adherence of pregnant women to Nordic dietary guidelines in relation to postpartum weight retention: results from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:75.
Google Scholar
Walker MC, Finkelstein SA, Rennicks White R, Shachkina S, Smith GN, Wen SW, Rodger M. The Ottawa and Kingston (OaK) Birth Cohort: development and achievements. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;11:1124–33.
Google Scholar
Webster GM, Teschke K, Janssen PA. Recruitment of healthy first-trimester pregnant women: lessons from the Chemicals, Health & Pregnancy study (CHirP). Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(2):430–8.
Google Scholar
Zook PM, Jordan C, Adams B, Visness CM, Walter M, Chen A, et al. Retention strategies and predictors of attrition in an urban pediatric asthma study. Clin Trials. 2010;7(4):400–10.
Google Scholar
Bartholomew K, Morton S, Atatoa Carr PE, Bandara DK, Grant CC. Provider engagement and choice in the Lead Maternity Carer System: Evidence from Growing Up in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:323–30.
Google Scholar
Morrens B, Den Hond E, Schoeters,G. et al. Human biomonitoring from an environmental justice perspective: supporting study participation of women of Turkish and Moroccan descent. Environ Health. 2017;16:48.
Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, Stanford JB, Wesselink AK, McKinnon C, Gruschow SM, Horgan CE, Wiley AS, Hahn KA, Sørensen HT, Hatch EE. Design and Conduct of an Internet-Based Preconception Cohort Study in North America: Pregnancy Study Online. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(4):360–71.
Google Scholar
Cronin M. Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the women whose names were not recorded: The legacy of J Marion Sims. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020;48(3_suppl):6–13.
Google Scholar
Korver N, Quee PJ, Boos HBM, Simons CJP, de Haan L, et al. Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP), a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene–environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(3):205–21.
Google Scholar
Sharp GC, Lawlor DA. Paternal impact on the life course development of obesity and type 2 diabetes in the offspring. Diabetologia. 2019;62(10):1802–10.
Google Scholar
McDonald SW, Lyon AW, Benzies KM, et al. The All Our Babies pregnancy cohort: design, methods, and participant characteristics. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:S2.
Google Scholar
Park B, Choi EJ, Ha E, Choi JH, Kim Y, Hong YC, et al. A study on the factors affecting the follow-up participation in birth cohorts. Environ Health Toxicol. 2016;31:e2016023.
Google Scholar
Snow ME, Tweedie K, Pederson A. Heard and valued: the development of a model to meaningfully engage marginalized populations in health services planning. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:181.
Google Scholar
Willis MD, Hoffman MN, Wang TR, Sabbath EL, Kuriyama AS, Wesselink AK, Wise LA. Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024;38(7):627–34.
Google Scholar
Nguyen NH, Subhan FB, Williams K, Chan CB. Barriers and Mitigating Strategies to Healthcare Access in Indigenous Communities of Canada: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(2):112.
Google Scholar
Wilson R, Rourke J. Report card on access to rural health care in Canada. Rural Remote Health. 2023;23(1):8108.
Google Scholar
Boyer Y. Healing racism in Canadian health care. CMAJ. 2018;189(46):E1408–9. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.171234.
Sun C, Velazquez MA, Fleming TP. Chapter 3: DOHaD and the Periconceptional Period, a Critical Window in Time in The Epigenome and Development Origins of Health and Disease. Academic Press 2016; 33–47.
Messerlian C, Williams PL, Ford JB, Chavarro JE, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Dadd R, et al and the EARTH Study Team. The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study: A Prospective Preconception Cohort. Hum Reprod Open 2018;2018(2):hoy001.
Harville EW, Mishra GD, Yeung E, Mumford SL, Schisterman EF, Jukic AM, et al. The Preconception Period analysis of Risks and Exposures Influencing health and Development (PrePARED) consortium. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(6):490–502.
Google Scholar
Sexton K, Needham LL, Pirkle JL. Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals. Measuring chemicals in human tissues is the “gold standard” for assessing people’s exposure to pollution. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Am Sci. 2004;92:38–45.
Google Scholar
Buck Louis GM, Barr DB, Kannan K, Chen Z, Kim S, Sundaram R. Paternal exposures to environmental chemicals and time-to-pregnancy: overview of results from the LIFE study. Andrology. 2016;4(4):639–47.
Google Scholar
link
